Climate Finance : The ways in which money is saving the planet
Today’s blog post is about climate
finance which is a very important aspect of the fight against climate change. Climate
finance has been given due attention in both the Kyoto Protocol and Paris
Agreement. But what is climate finance? Climate finance basically refers to the
flow of finance from public, private, national and international entities to go
towards the efforts to combat climate change.
This money goes towards efforts to lower greenhouse gas emissions, to fund transition to a low carbon pathway, aid in climate resilient development, aid in adaptation to the effects of climate change, and in recouping from loss and damage, that is, regrouping. While still growing and developing, climate finance is a very wide and diverse field but basically encompasses all money that is used in climate action.
Climate change is caused by
greenhouse gas emissions, the majority of which are from developed countries.
But the most vulnerable and affected by climate change are countries in the
African continent and Asia, the least developed countries, island countries.
These groups contribute the least in terms of amounts of climate warming
emissions into the atmosphere.
Under the principle of common but
differentiated responsibility and stemming from the polluter pays principle[1]
developed countries have a huge responsibility to act on climate, and need to
act to lower their huge percentages of emissions, something which because of
their financial muscle and already developed economies they are significantly more capable of doing. But
for developing countries which are also most affected, their economies cannot fully
or effectively finance mitigation (lowering of emissions) as well as adaptation
(grappling with the worst effects of climate change).
Because of these two reasons,
there arises a need to help developing countries to lower their emissions as
they develop, as well as adapt to climate change. This means finance is required.
Finance is required to find alternative sources of clean energy, such as solar
energy. Massive investments are needed to finance the upcoming renewable energy
sector which can provide a clean source of energy to power the economy.
Investments would also be needed
to help lower emissions from agriculture which is the biggest sector in Africa.
In adaptation for example, money is needed to help communities and industries
latch on to newer climate resilient ways
of earning livelihoods and in running their operations.
Green Finance - image courtesy of slideshare.net |
Globally, money is needed to power
the transition to a low carbon development pathway, that is, a way of
development that releases the least greenhouse gas emissions (mainly carbon
dioxide gas) into the air. For the last few years there has been massive
commitments by multinational conglomerates like companies under the
RE100 initiative such as
Google and Apple to switch their energy needs from fossil fuels to renewable energy, with some going as far as financing energy projects .
Google has some investments in renewable energy farms in Africa and South America There is
quite the shift by significant polluters to ‘green’ their operations worldwide.
Sustainable business practices which are healthy for the planet are necessary
and as we become more conscious of the effect of greenhouse gas emissions on
the planet and the resultant costs, it makes sense to switch to low emissions
pathway.
Tesla is making strides in the
renewable energy pathway, such as the lithium ion battery switched on in Australia
in December last. Such activities need massive investment, something Tesla’s billionaire
founder Elon Musk has under control.
Internationally, there are several
ways finance flows, that is, North to North (developed countries to developed
countries); North to South (developed countries to developing countries) and
South to South that is; from developing countries to developing countries. Internationally
also, there are several entities that are involved in the disbursement of
finance to most affected countries. The Global Environment Facility (GEF) working
under the UNFCCC is an example of such. It has structures in place where developing
countries can apply for funding. In particular, there is the Least Developed
Countries Fund and Special Climate Change Fund which are run by GEF and are
mechanisms through which climate finance is channeled.
The Global Climate Fund is also
another example and is the most centrally recognized to receive and distribute
finance to countries affected by climate change. It has the responsibility of
raising about 100 billion dollars per year and disbursing this to countries
hard hit by climate change. 100 billion dollars is the base set by the Paris
Agreement but as according to the World Resources Institute,
about 5 trillion dollars are needed for green investments annually by 2020. The Global Climate Finance Report reports more comprehensively on the flows of finance in climate globally as well as trends that help identify investment opportunities.
These investments are not in vain
though, - they pay off. According to IRENA, green energy jobs are growing and
there is fast growth in the renewable energy sector, caused by some among
others, the cost of clean tech going down.
The Adaptation Fund is another
mechanism for climate finance. It is funded by a levy on carbon trading. Carbon
trading in its simplest terms is whereby entities or countries unable to fully
avoid emissions buy emission reduction units ( pay someone elsewhere for either
absorbing the directly proportional amount of emissions released by the polluting entity).
All this is of course regulated.
Finance can also be from public
sources such as public funds run by governments (budgetary allocations) or it
can be from private sources such as banks. An example of this would be the
African Development Bank or the Asian Development Fund.
Green bonds are becoming popular
in the financial sector because as financial tools, they are able to raise cash
as well as the fact that proceeds are used to finance environmentally
sustainable and safe projects. Green bonds have been issued by companies such
as Apple and have overall been well subscribed to. Last year, Apple’s bond
raised 1 billion dollars to finance climate projects. Green bonds are perhaps
ideal because they offer a greater deal of transparency and reporting.
Insurance is another area where
finance intersects with climate. Although still growing, insurance can be used
to cover the costs of restructuring from loss and damage occasioned by climate related
disasters / extreme weather events. Insurance money is used to rebuild lives
and infrastructure, provide immediate health services for the affected as well
as insure sensitive and vulnerable sectors like agriculture and coastal
properties. The hitch here is that it can be difficult to fully estimate in
advance, and therefore recompense the level of damage a climate disaster can
cause. Several Caribbean countries got insurance payouts arising from the two
hurricanes (Irma and Maria) that hit them last year.
There is need for money to be invested in clean tech in
the energy sector or in carbon capture and storage technology. Also in
developing cheaper methods of wind and solar power generation, access and storage.
There is also divestment from
fossil fuel companies. Divestment means moving away from particular sectors one
had previously invested in a portfolio. The New York City Pensions Fund decided to divest from fossil fuels in the interests of securing the future of the city
and its residents from climate change and its worst effects. This has been
replicated in some parts of Europe like Ireland. If these funds were further to
be invested in renewable energy, that
would be a major plus.
Another way to raise climate finance
is by carbon taxes or carbon pricing. This is based on the polluter pays
principle, whereby a company is taxed or pays for every ton of carbon dioxide
they release into the air, or for every ton of carbon dioxide that is emitted
in their operations. Canada had proposed a carbon price in their country.
Generally, climate finance is
necessary if we are to shift the whole planet to a low carbon development
pathway. It can be as simple as money that is needed to build climate proof infrastructure.
This is infrastructure that can be able to withstand the vagaries of climate
change.
It also intersects with
development when money is invested in basic services such as health in case of
climate aided disease outbreaks and creating resilient health institutions and
research stations to help combat such outbreaks. However, climate finance must be money that is over and above any other type of aid given to developing countries - it is specifically because of climate action.
Climate finance is quite a complex
and wide field but one which is absolutely necessary in the climate action.
Closing remarks? The fossil fuel
era is coming to an end, however long or short, tortuous or pleasant the road
is, and again for young people, we must be at the forefront. There is much to
gain, both for ourselves and on the planet.
[1] In
its most basic form, it means that whoever is responsible for any form of
environmental damage is also responsible for cleaning it up , and that means
also footing the cost.
Comments
Post a Comment